Go To SPOXTalk.comHome

     Total Page Views
We received
29555094
page views since Nov 2004

     Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code


     Shop Amazon


     Stories By Topic
Vermont News



A Judge Lynching
All My Aliens
Announcements
Art News
Health News
Holidays
Humor
Interviews
Opinion
Paranormal News
Political News
Sci-fi News
Science News
Spiritual News
The News
Travel News
Unusual News
Vermont News

     Exploration
· Home
· 007
· Ask_Shabby
· Content
· Dates
· Downloads
· FAQ
· Feedback
· Fine_Print
· Forums
· Fun_Stuff
· Game_World
· Home_Grown
· Journal
· Link_To
· Private Messages
· QNL
· Recommend Us
· Reviews
· Search
· Site_Credits
· SPOX_Talk
· Stone_Tarot
· Stores_Shop
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Tell_Us
· Top 10
· Top Stories
· Topics
· Weather_Station
· Web Links
· Your Account

     Who's Online
There are currently, 66 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

     Monthly Quote
“If a man has an apartment stacked to the ceiling with newspapers we call him crazy. If a woman has a trailer house full of cats we call her nuts. But when people pathologically hoard so much cash that they impoverish the entire nation, we put them on the cover of Fortune magazine and pretend that they are role models.”
-– B. Lester

     Link to us!
AlienLove Logos

Add Your Link To Us!

     Anti-War Webs
Anti-War Web Ring
[<<<] [ list ] [???] [ join ] [>>>]

 Business/Economy: The Perils of Watered-Down Regulations

Environment
The West Virginia chemical spill brought to light the failure of the government to assess either the dangers posed by industrial chemicals or the factories that manufacture them.

By Jill Richardson

“There’s a folksy saying my grandma taught me: ‘If it smells like licorice and tastes like licorice, it must be licorice.’ Now it has a corollary: ‘Or it could also be a 4-methylcyclohexane methanol spill into your water supply, so grab the children and run for your lives.’ It’s not quite as folksy anymore.”

My friend Bill Harnsberger was joking when he posted that on his Facebook page, but it hints at a deeper truth. The world we live in isn’t as simple as the world of our grandparents.

Back in Grandma’s day, there were plenty of dangers around, but most of them were due to nature — or your own stupidity. But now, a corporation you’ve never heard of can screw up and contaminate the water supply for 300,000 people in nine counties so badly that they can’t use it for anything but flushing the toilet.

By now we’ve all heard about the massive chemical spill in West Virginia. Freedom Industries, the company that spilled the coal industry chemical, has now declared bankruptcy. Authorities say the people of West Virginia can drink their water again – although who knows how many of them actually feel it’s safe to do so.

As for the big “clean up” plan used in the disaster, it was simple: let the chemical dissipate. It’s still out there — all of it — just really, really watered down. Hopefully so much so that it won’t cause any health or environmental problems, but who knows. Because as the The Washington Post pointed out, the answer to many safety questions for the licorice-scented substance is: “No data available.” ...



Shop Amazon with AlienLove
Help Support AlienLove - Shop Amazon




Yep, that’s right. Does it cause cancer? “No data available.” Reproductive toxicity? “No data available.” Thanks, environmental laws. Because, you know, the EPA is an out-of-control government agency trying to kill business with over-regulation by not even forcing corporations to find out if the chemicals they create are toxic or not.

So the chemical will just go down the river. And if you’re breathing a sigh of relief that you don’t live near or drink from West Virginia’s Elk River, be warned that the water where the spill occurs ultimately flows into the much larger Ohio River. And that body of water flows into the Mississippi.

This information turns an attitude of “stinks to be you” into “no man is an island.”

Of course, the chemical will be diluted to extremely small concentrations before it reaches the Mississippi. And let’s hope the plants, fungi, and bacteria out in nature work their magic to break it down, or at least immobilize the chemical.

But it reminds us why we have laws to protect the environment. Really, they are laws to protect us.

Sometimes I wonder, what’s more important, the economy or the American people? We talk about the economy as this abstract entity that must be maintained above all else. Really, it’s there to serve us.

Would it really kill jobs if the plant that spilled the chemical was inspected more often? (It was last inspected in 1991.) Or if the chemical manufacturer had to thoroughly test the safety of its products? And even if it would, what’s more important — a few people’s jobs, or the health and safety of the 300,000 people whose drinking water was contaminated?

Besides, the chemical spill was decidedly lousy for jobs. Freedom Industries is now bankrupt. Who knows what will happen to its employees?

And how many businesses had to close while they had no clean water? On the other hand, requiring companies to test chemicals and inspecting them for safety would create plenty of jobs.

A certain segment of society loves to demonize environmental laws, but right now, the law has only required safety testing of about 200 chemicals out of 84,000 in use today. So how about those other 83,800?

Let’s reform our toxic chemical laws before the next spill happens.

************

OtherWords columnist Jill Richardson is the author of Recipe for America: Why Our Food System Is Broken and What We Can Do to Fix It
Distributed via Otherwords.org

************

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative 3.0 License, and distributed by Otherwords.org, a project of Institute for Policy Studies, IPS

************

[27 January 2014]





Discuss this article in our forums.

Listen To SPOXTalk.



 
     Related Links
· More about Environment
· News by Blue1moon


Most read story about Environment:
Obama Approves Raising Permissible Levels of Nuclear Radiation in Drinking Water


     Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


     Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


"The Perils of Watered-Down Regulations" | Login/Create an Account | 0 comments
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register




Site Copyright AlienLove 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
AlienLove is part of Scifillian Inc.
and SpoxTalk.com

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.
Page Generation: 0.10 Seconds